Best Embedded Software Development Companies

Data Respons vs QuEST Global: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Data Respons (3.9/5) edges ahead of QuEST Global (3.8/5) overall. Data Respons is the better choice for nordic and multi-sector programs needing embedded engineering across regulated verticals. QuEST Global is the stronger option for multi-vertical enterprises needing embedded engineering alongside broader R&D. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Data Respons vs QuEST Global: head-to-head summary

Criterion Data Respons QuEST Global
Founded 1986 1997
HQ Høvik, Norway Singapore
Team size 1,400 20,000+
Rating 3.9 / 5 3.8 / 5
Primary differentiator Nearly 40-year Nordic embedded specialist spanning eight distinct sectors, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions Very broad engineering-services scale (90+ delivery centers, 18+ countries) offering end-to-end silicon and embedded engineering directly to chipmakers
Pricing model Fixed project, dedicated team Fixed project, dedicated team
Min. engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Primary tech stack Embedded Linux, C/C++, RTOS Embedded C/C++, RTOS, Semiconductor/silicon engineering support
Industries served Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime, Medtech, Defense & Security Aerospace & Defense, Automotive, Energy, Healthcare, Rail, Semiconductor

Data Respons vs QuEST Global: overview

Data Respons

Data Respons, founded in 1986 and headquartered in Høvik, Norway, develops embedded systems across transport & automotive, telecom & media, industrial automation, energy & maritime, medtech, space, defense & security, and finance & public sectors, employing roughly 1,400 people across Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, and Taiwan. AKKA Technologies acquired Data Respons via a compulsory share acquisition completed in May 2020, delisting it from the Oslo Stock Exchange; AKKA itself later became part of Akkodis (Adecco Group). For a buyer specifically evaluating whether Data Respons retains an independent embedded delivery identity post-acquisition, the answer appears to be yes — the practice remains genuinely embedded-focused rather than folded into a generalist engineering pool, but confirming current team continuity directly is still worthwhile given two ownership transitions in five years.

QuEST Global

QuEST Global was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in Singapore, operating over 90 delivery centers across 18+ countries and serving a very broad set of industries — aerospace and defense, automotive, energy, hi-tech, healthcare, rail, and semiconductors. Reported employee counts vary substantially by source (roughly 21,500 to over 32,000), which is itself a useful signal for a buyer: a firm this large and this diversified doesn't lend itself to a single precise headcount figure the way a boutique does. Embedded and silicon engineering is offered directly to chipmakers as part of end-to-end services, but it's one capability among the firm's many vertical practices rather than a dedicated embedded specialty.

Services and capabilities: Data Respons vs QuEST Global

Capability Data Respons QuEST Global
RTOS firmware development
Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot)
FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL)
Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering
IoT connectivity & protocols
Edge AI / on-device ML
Embedded GUI development
Cybersecurity & secure boot
Staff augmentation / team extension

Tech stack comparison: Data Respons vs QuEST Global

Framework / platform Data Respons QuEST Global
FreeRTOS N/A N/A
Zephyr N/A N/A
Embedded Linux N/A
AUTOSAR N/A N/A
AWS N/A N/A
Bluetooth N/A N/A
LoRaWAN N/A N/A
CAN bus N/A N/A
Qt N/A N/A
Verilog N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Data Respons vs QuEST Global

Criterion Data Respons QuEST Global
Minimum engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Engagement models Fixed project, Dedicated team Fixed project, Dedicated team
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Data Respons vs QuEST Global

Dimension Data Respons QuEST Global
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime Aerospace & Defense, Automotive, Energy
Best use cases Maritime or defense programs needing embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity, Medtech products requiring embedded engineering from a multi-sector specialist team with a long independent operating history Semiconductor companies needing end-to-end silicon and embedded engineering support, Multi-vertical enterprises consolidating embedded work with other engineering domains under one vendor
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Data Respons vs QuEST Global: pros and cons

Data Respons
+ Nearly 40 years of embedded systems specialization across eight distinct sectors, from maritime to medtech to defense
+ Nordic regional presence (Norway, Sweden, Denmark) plus Germany and Taiwan offices supports European and APAC delivery
+ Retains a genuinely embedded-focused delivery team despite two ownership transitions (AKKA in 2020, then Akkodis)
- Two ownership transitions in five years (AKKA Technologies 2020, then folded into Akkodis) — confirm current team continuity directly before committing
- 1,400-employee scale sits below the largest global engineering firms for very large concurrent programs
- No public pricing or minimum engagement figures published
QuEST Global
+ 90+ delivery centers across 18+ countries support very large, globally distributed engineering programs
+ End-to-end silicon and embedded engineering services offered directly to chipmakers, not just downstream product companies
+ Broad vertical coverage means one vendor can support embedded needs across multiple business units
- Reported employee counts vary widely by source (21,500 to 32,000+), making exact capacity hard to verify
- Embedded/silicon engineering is one capability among many verticals rather than the firm's central specialization
- Scale and process overhead of a firm this size may be a mismatch for small, fast-moving embedded projects

Who should choose Data Respons?

A typical fit: maritime or defense programs needing embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity.

Nearly 40-year Nordic embedded specialist spanning eight distinct sectors, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime, Medtech, Defense & Security.

Who should choose QuEST Global?

A typical fit: semiconductor companies needing end-to-end silicon and embedded engineering support.

Very broad engineering-services scale (90+ delivery centers, 18+ countries) offering end-to-end silicon and embedded engineering directly to chipmakers. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Aerospace & Defense, Automotive, Energy, Healthcare, Rail, Semiconductor.

Decision matrix: Data Respons vs QuEST Global

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Data Respons
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Data Respons
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Data Respons (Not disclosed) vs QuEST Global (Not disclosed)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical QuEST Global
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build QuEST Global

Use case fit: Data Respons vs QuEST Global

Use case Data Respons fit QuEST Global fit Winner
Maritime or defense programs needing embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity Strong Limited Data Respons
Medtech products requiring embedded engineering from a multi-sector specialist team with a long independent operating history Strong Limited Data Respons
Semiconductor companies needing end-to-end silicon and embedded engineering support Limited Strong QuEST Global
Multi-vertical enterprises consolidating embedded work with other engineering domains under one vendor Limited Strong QuEST Global
Fixed-price build Limited Limited Both equally
Staff augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Data Respons vs QuEST Global

Data Respons (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software Development projects. Nearly 40-year Nordic embedded specialist spanning eight distinct sectors, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions.

QuEST Global (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need multi-vertical enterprises consolidating embedded work with other engineering domains under one vendor. If your situation matches that, QuEST Global is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Data Respons vs QuEST Global FAQ

Is Data Respons better than QuEST Global?

Data Respons (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Data Respons's strongest advantage: nearly 40 years of embedded systems specialization across eight distinct sectors, from maritime to medtech to defense. QuEST Global's strongest advantage: 90+ delivery centers across 18+ countries support very large, globally distributed engineering programs.

How do Data Respons and QuEST Global differ in pricing?

Data Respons uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. QuEST Global uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Data Respons or QuEST Global?

QuEST Global is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Data Respons and QuEST Global?

Data Respons's primary differentiator is: nearly 40-year Nordic embedded specialist spanning eight distinct sectors, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions. QuEST Global's primary differentiator is: very broad engineering-services scale (90+ delivery centers, 18+ countries) offering end-to-end silicon and embedded engineering directly to chipmakers. They also differ in team size (1,400 vs 20,000+), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media vs Aerospace & Defense, Automotive).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.